[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250313-graceful-jackdaw-of-opportunity-62996d@krzk-bin>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 09:24:12 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm QCS615
Graphics clock controller
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
+
> + '#reset-cells':
> + const: 1
> +
> + '#power-domain-cells':
> + const: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - clocks
> + - '#clock-cells'
> + - '#reset-cells'
> + - '#power-domain-cells'
> +
I don't get why this binding is different than others and you do not
reference qcom,gcc.yaml? Is it not applicable here? Other gpucc do
reference.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists