[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9K2PJEoymuhamT-@pollux>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:41:00 +0100
From: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>
To: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com, boqun.feng@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, a.hindborg@...nel.org,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rust: device: implement device context marker
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:29:35AM +0000, Benno Lossin wrote:
> On Thu Mar 13, 2025 at 3:13 AM CET, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> > +/// Marker trait for the context of a bus specific device.
> > +///
> > +/// Some functions of a bus specific device should only be called from a certain context, i.e. bus
> > +/// callbacks, such as `probe()`.
> > +///
> > +/// This is the marker trait for structures representing the context of a bus specific device.
> > +pub trait DeviceContext {}
>
> I would make this trait sealed. ie:
>
> pub trait DeviceContext: private::Sealed {}
>
> mod private {
> pub trait Sealed {}
>
> impl Sealed for super::Core {}
> impl Sealed for super::Normal {}
> }
>
> Since currently a user can create a custom context (it will be useless,
> but then I think it still is better to give them a compile error).
That is intentional, some busses have bus specific callbacks, hence we may want
a bus specific context at some point.
However, we can always change visibility as needed, so I'm fine making it sealed
for now.
>
> If you make it sealed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists