linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] fuse: add more control over cache invalidation behaviour

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871pv1f7vg.fsf@igalia.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:11:15 +0000
From: Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@....com>,  Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
  Matt Harvey <mharvey@...ptrading.com>,  linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] fuse: add more control over cache invalidation
 behaviour

On Thu, Mar 13 2025, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 at 12:25, Luis Henriques <luis@...lia.com> wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... And would you like this to be done in fuse?  Or do you expect this
>> to me a more generic mechanism in dcache, available for other filesystems
>> as well?
>
> I don't know if this would be useful for anything else, so initially
> fuse specific.
>
> An list sorted by expiry time (implemented with an rbtree) would work,
> I think.

Great, thanks.  As I said, I've added this to my TODO; once we have this
patch sorted out, I'll move into that.  Thanks, Miklos.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís