[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <pjfrevsiu6gyyrvncbel5upglwu3lgcxdccrm26b3rlqwcmnx6@di3hjzxyl6ar>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:25:09 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/10] memcg: no refilling stock from
obj_cgroup_release
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:26:27PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-03-13 23:15:06 [-0700], Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > obj_cgroup_release is called when all the references to the objcg has
>
> "references to the objcg have"
>
> > been released i.e. no more memory objects are pointing to it. Most
> > probably objcg->memcg will be pointing to some ancestor memcg and at the
> > moment, in obj_cgroup_release, the kernel call
> > obj_cgroup_uncharge_pages() to uncharge last remaining memory.
>
> This sounds somehow funny. I think the point is to uncharge the pages
> without tampering memcg_stock because it is unnecessary.
>
Thanks, I will see to make the point more clean in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists