[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f52bc66-1ad3-4b8a-b2a7-2d25d3f544a4@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:02:11 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Thomas Gleixner
<tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andy Lutomirski
<luto@...nel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Boris Ostrovsky
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/syscall/x32: Move x32 syscall table
On 3/14/2025 2:34 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com> wrote:
>
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
>>> +long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
>>> +{
>>> + switch (nr) {
>>> + #include <asm/syscalls_x32.h>
>>> + default: return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
>>> + }
>>> +};
>>
>> There seems to be a stray semicolon here. The original code also has it
>> but it doesn't seem necessary.
>
> BTW., seeing that you've gone through this series with a fine comb I've
> added your Reviewed-by tag to the series (with the caveat that the
> details you've pointed out will be addressed in followup patches).
> Let me know if that's not OK.
>
Thanks, that would have been fine with me. Reviewing the v2 series now.
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists