[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <174192385437.14370.8812406188343679236.b4-ty@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 09:16:53 +0530
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Naveen N Rao <naveen@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning
On Wed, 05 Mar 2025 00:00:19 +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> The following build warning have been reported:
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_rmhandlers.o: warning: objtool: .text+0xe84: intra_function_call not a direct call
> arch/powerpc/kernel/switch.o: warning: objtool: .text+0x4: intra_function_call not a direct call
>
> This happens due to commit bb7f054f4de2 ("objtool/powerpc: Add support
> for decoding all types of uncond branches") because that commit decodes
> 'bl .+4' as a normal instruction because that instruction is used by
> clang instead of 'bcl 20,31,+.4' for relocatable code.
>
> [...]
Applied to powerpc/next.
[1/1] powerpc: Fix 'intra_function_call not a direct call' warning
https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/382094a41c706bf9d990a224d5d4d34c02a21f15
Thanks
Powered by blists - more mailing lists