lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9RjHpEJGWtj8PAM@x1>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:10:54 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>,
	Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>,
	guoren <guoren@...nel.org>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
	Bibo Mao <maobibo@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Björn Töpel <bjorn@...osinc.com>,
	Howard Chu <howardchu95@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] perf: Support multiple system call tables in
 the build

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 10:45:49PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:47:27PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 05:20:09PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Still building, but noticed this on x86_64:
> > > 
> > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests                              : FAILED!
> > > 106: perf trace BTF general tests                                    : FAILED!
> > > 107: perf trace exit race                                            : Ok
> > > 108: perf trace record and replay                                    : FAILED!
> > > 
> > > 
> > > The first doesn´t help that much with verbose mode, haven't checked if
> > > before this series it was failing :-\
> > > 
> > > root@x1:~# perf test -vvv 105
> > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests:
> > > --- start ---
> > > test child forked, pid 19411
> > > Checking if vmlinux exists
> > > Tracing syscall landlock_add_rule
> > > ---- end(-1) ----
> > > 105: perf trace enum augmentation tests                              : FAILED!
> > > root@x1:~#
> > 
> > So:
> > 
> > root@x1:~# perf trace -e landlock_add_rule perf test -w landlock
> > root@x1:~# 
> > 
> > But:
> > 
> > root@x1:~# perf trace perf test -w landlock |& grep landlock_add_rule
> >     26.120 ( 0.002 ms): perf/19791 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_PATH_BENEATH, rule_attr: 0x7ffde75e2680, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> >     26.124 ( 0.001 ms): perf/19791 landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd: 11, rule_type: LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT, rule_attr: 0x7ffde75e2690, flags: 45) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
> > root@x1:~# 
> > 
> > -e is having some trouble, when no event is specified, then it works.
> > 
> > Something in the changes made to:
> > 
> > static int trace__parse_events_option(const struct option *opt, const char *str,
> >                                       int unset __maybe_unused)
> 
> Thanks for the test, I think this should fix it:
> 

Well, not really:

root@...ber:~# perf trace -e landlock_add_rule perf test -w landlock
perf: Segmentation fault
Obtained 10 stack frames.
perf() [0x5be761]
perf() [0x5be7f9]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x40fd0) [0x7fe005c4efd0]
perf() [0x491bc1]
perf() [0x497090]
perf() [0x4973ab]
perf() [0x413483]
/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x2a088) [0x7fe005c38088]
/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0x8b) [0x7fe005c3814b]
perf() [0x413ad5]
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
root@...ber:~#

Time for me to test another patch from Ian, the one symbolizing the
above backtrace...

- Arnaldo


> 
> 
> ---8<---
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/syscalltbl.c b/tools/perf/util/syscalltbl.c
> index ace66e69c1bcde1e..67a8ec10e9e4bc8d 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/syscalltbl.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/syscalltbl.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ int syscalltbl__id(int e_machine, const char *name)
>  {
>         const struct syscalltbl *table = find_table(e_machine);
>         struct syscall_cmp_key key;
> -       const int *id;
> +       const uint16_t *id;
>  
>         if (!table)
>                 return -1;

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ