linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 40/41] scripts/dtc: Update fdt.h to the latest version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250314204701.GA2210106-robh@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:47:01 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 40/41] scripts/dtc: Update fdt.h to the latest version

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 08:10:11AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Update the header to this upstream version to change the
> __ASSEMBLY__ macro into __ASSEMBLER__ :
> 
> https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/utils/dtc/dtc.git/commit/?id=f4c53f4ebf78
> 
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> Cc: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>
> Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> ---
>  scripts/dtc/libfdt/fdt.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Are you wanting me to apply this or ack it? Normally we only change dtc 
with the sync with upstream script.

Or maybe it doesn't matter? Do we use this header in any assembly in the 
kernel? Offhand, I don't think so.

Rob