[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJ-ks9=zFuH=4Sm-zqR_kAuv=fmwpCh__fXgxcoRgc5XuQ46Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 16:50:43 -0400
From: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>, Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:45 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:29:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > On Fri 2025-03-07 06:27:33, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> > > being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
> > > addition to the enclosed patch, please consider this an RFC on the
> > > removal of the "Test Module" kselftest machinery.
> > >
> > > Tamir Duberstein (6):
> > > scanf: implicate test line in failure messages
> > > scanf: remove redundant debug logs
> > > scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
> > > scanf: break kunit into test cases
> >
> > Kees, could you please take the above 5 patches as well
> > via the tree moving the KUNIT tests to lib/tests ?
>
> I think you mean 4? Sure!
4 by my count as well :)
Please let me know if you'd like me to respin with conflicts resolved!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists