[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3661803.LM0AJKV5NW@camazotz>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 17:12:34 -0500
From: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
To: shuah@...nel.org, Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>, wine-devel@...ehq.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ntsync: fix the wrong condition in wake_all
On Friday, 14 March 2025 02:14:51 CDT Su Hui wrote:
> When 'manual=false' and 'signaled=true', then expected value when using
> NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT should be greater than zero. Fix this typo error.
>
> Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
> index 3aad311574c4..bfb6fad653d0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
> @@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ TEST(wake_all)
> auto_event_args.manual = false;
> auto_event_args.signaled = true;
> objs[3] = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT, &auto_event_args);
> - EXPECT_EQ(0, objs[3]);
> + EXPECT_LE(0, objs[3]);
>
> wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000);
> wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs;
>
Reviewed-by: Elizabeth Figura <zfigura@...eweavers.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists