[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250314061511.1308152-2-shakeel.butt@linux.dev>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 23:15:02 -0700
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 01/10] memcg: remove root memcg check from refill_stock
refill_stock can not be called with root memcg, so there is no need to
check it.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index b29433eb17fa..c09a32e93d39 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1883,6 +1883,7 @@ static void __refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
drain_stock(stock);
}
+/* Should never be called with root_mem_cgroup. */
static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -1892,8 +1893,6 @@ static void refill_stock(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, unsigned int nr_pages)
* In case of unlikely failure to lock percpu stock_lock
* uncharge memcg directly.
*/
- if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
- return;
page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memory, nr_pages);
if (do_memsw_account())
page_counter_uncharge(&memcg->memsw, nr_pages);
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists