[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250314071454.201697-2-suhui@nfschina.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:14:51 +0800
From: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
To: zfigura@...eweavers.com,
shuah@...nel.org
Cc: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>,
wine-devel@...ehq.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] selftests: ntsync: fix the wrong condition in wake_all
When 'manual=false' and 'signaled=true', then expected value when using
NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT should be greater than zero. Fix this typo error.
Signed-off-by: Su Hui <suhui@...china.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
index 3aad311574c4..bfb6fad653d0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/ntsync/ntsync.c
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ TEST(wake_all)
auto_event_args.manual = false;
auto_event_args.signaled = true;
objs[3] = ioctl(fd, NTSYNC_IOC_CREATE_EVENT, &auto_event_args);
- EXPECT_EQ(0, objs[3]);
+ EXPECT_LE(0, objs[3]);
wait_args.timeout = get_abs_timeout(1000);
wait_args.objs = (uintptr_t)objs;
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists