| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <b8e529f340a9c25c270a77733c79ffc590a9935c.1741938027.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 13:14:10 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mahesh Kumar <maheshkumar657g@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/3] ext4: avoid journaling sb update on error if journal is destroying
Presently we always BUG_ON if trying to start a transaction on a journal marked
with JBD2_UNMOUNT, since this should never happen. However, while ltp running
stress tests, it was observed that in case of some error handling paths, it is
possible for update_super_work to start a transaction after the journal is
destroyed eg:
(umount)
ext4_kill_sb
kill_block_super
generic_shutdown_super
sync_filesystem /* commits all txns */
evict_inodes
/* might start a new txn */
ext4_put_super
flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work) /* flush the workqueue */
jbd2_journal_destroy
journal_kill_thread
journal->j_flags |= JBD2_UNMOUNT;
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
jbd2_journal_get_descriptor_buffer
jbd2_journal_bmap
ext4_journal_bmap
ext4_map_blocks
...
ext4_inode_error
ext4_handle_error
schedule_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work)
/* work queue kicks in */
update_super_work
jbd2_journal_start
start_this_handle
BUG_ON(journal->j_flags &
JBD2_UNMOUNT)
Hence, introduce a new mount flag to indicate journal is destroying and only do
a journaled (and deferred) update of sb if this flag is not set. Otherwise, just
fallback to an un-journaled commit.
Further, in the journal destroy path, we have the following sequence:
1. Set mount flag indicating journal is destroying
2. force a commit and wait for it
3. flush pending sb updates
This sequence is important as it ensures that, after this point, there is no sb
update that might be journaled so it is safe to update the sb outside the
journal. (To avoid race discussed in 2d01ddc86606)
Also, we don't need a similar check in ext4_grp_locked_error since it is only
called from mballoc and AFAICT it would be always valid to schedule work here.
Fixes: 2d01ddc86606 ("ext4: save error info to sb through journal if available")
Reported-by: Mahesh Kumar <maheshkumar657g@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
fs/ext4/super.c | 12 ++++++------
3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 2b7d781bfcad..ee54b8510791 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ struct ext4_inode_info {
#define EXT4_ERROR_FS 0x0002 /* Errors detected */
#define EXT4_ORPHAN_FS 0x0004 /* Orphans being recovered */
#define EXT4_FC_REPLAY 0x0020 /* Fast commit replay ongoing */
+#define EXT4_JOURNAL_DESTORY 0x0040 /* Journal is in process of destroying */
/*
* Misc. filesystem flags
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
index 9b3c9df02a39..f054db9fa9e1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4_jbd2.h
@@ -437,6 +437,21 @@ static inline int ext4_journal_destroy(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi, journal_t *jour
{
int err = 0;
+ /*
+ * At this point only two things can be operating on the journal.
+ * JBD2 thread performing transaction commit and s_sb_upd_work
+ * issuing sb update through the journal. Once we set
+ * EXT4_JOURNAL_DESTROY, new ext4_handle_error() calls will not
+ * queue s_sb_upd_work and ext4_force_commit() makes sure any
+ * ext4_handle_error() calls from the running transaction commit are
+ * finished. Hence no new s_sb_upd_work can be queued after we
+ * flush it here.
+ */
+ ext4_set_mount_flag(sbi->s_sb, EXT4_JOURNAL_DESTORY);
+
+ ext4_force_commit(sbi->s_sb);
+ flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work);
+
err = jbd2_journal_destroy(journal);
sbi->s_journal = NULL;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 8ad664d47806..54ef0cc566a4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -704,9 +704,13 @@ static void ext4_handle_error(struct super_block *sb, bool force_ro, int error,
* In case the fs should keep running, we need to writeout
* superblock through the journal. Due to lock ordering
* constraints, it may not be safe to do it right here so we
- * defer superblock flushing to a workqueue.
+ * defer superblock flushing to a workqueue. We just need to be
+ * careful when the journal is already shutting down. If we get
+ * here in that case, just update the sb directly as the last
+ * transaction won't commit anyway.
*/
- if (continue_fs && journal)
+ if (continue_fs && journal &&
+ !ext4_test_mount_flag(sb, EXT4_JOURNAL_DESTORY))
schedule_work(&EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sb_upd_work);
else
ext4_commit_super(sb);
@@ -4957,8 +4961,6 @@ static int ext4_load_and_init_journal(struct super_block *sb,
return 0;
out:
- /* flush s_sb_upd_work before destroying the journal. */
- flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work);
ext4_journal_destroy(sbi, sbi->s_journal);
return -EINVAL;
}
@@ -5648,8 +5650,6 @@ failed_mount8: __maybe_unused
sbi->s_ea_block_cache = NULL;
if (sbi->s_journal) {
- /* flush s_sb_upd_work before journal destroy. */
- flush_work(&sbi->s_sb_upd_work);
ext4_journal_destroy(sbi, sbi->s_journal);
}
failed_mount3a:
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists