[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9P2HsB6e1ccRyZT@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:25:50 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] x86/syscall/x32: Move x32 syscall table
* Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com> wrote:
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X32_ABI
> > +long x32_sys_call(const struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int nr)
> > +{
> > + switch (nr) {
> > + #include <asm/syscalls_x32.h>
> > + default: return __x64_sys_ni_syscall(regs);
> > + }
> > +};
>
> There seems to be a stray semicolon here. The original code also has it
> but it doesn't seem necessary.
Yeah, and this should be done in a followup patch.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists