[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250314123936.GO3890718@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:39:36 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>,
Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Jakob Riepler <jakob+lkml@...anoidlabs.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] leds: Introduce and use
fwnode_get_child_node_count()
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This series was inspired during review of "Support ROHM BD79124 ADC" [1].
> The three conversion patches are the examples of the new API in use.
>
> Since the first two examples of LEDS, in case of posotove response it may
> be routed via that tree and immutable branch/tag shared with others, e.g.,
> IIO which Matti's series is targeting and might be dependent on. The USB
> patch can be applied later separately, up to the respective maintainers.
Ah, just seen this.
I'm okay with that, but need Acks for the other patches.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists