[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9QvRJE0Yun5mfsN@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 14:29:40 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
On Fri 2025-03-07 06:27:33, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
> addition to the enclosed patch, please consider this an RFC on the
> removal of the "Test Module" kselftest machinery.
>
> Tamir Duberstein (6):
> scanf: implicate test line in failure messages
> scanf: remove redundant debug logs
> scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
> scanf: break kunit into test cases
Kees, could you please take the above 5 patches as well
via the tree moving the KUNIT tests to lib/tests ?
They seem to be ready for linux-next and the next merge window.
> scanf: tidy header `#include`s
This one is a bit controversial and might be added later.
> scanf: further break kunit into test cases
This one was just an attempt. But I personally think that
it is not worth it.
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists