lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c355664-50dd-4efd-94b7-9d93c02d3e80@kwiboo.se>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 09:20:07 +0100
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
 Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
 Ye Zhang <ye.zhang@...k-chips.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Sebastian Reichel
 <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...labora.com,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] thermal: rockchip: Support RK3576 SoC in the
 thermal driver

Hi Nicolas,

On 2025-02-28 21:06, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> From: Ye Zhang <ye.zhang@...k-chips.com>
> 
> The RK3576 SoC has six TS-ADC channels: TOP, BIG_CORE, LITTLE_CORE,
> DDR, NPU and GPU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ye Zhang <ye.zhang@...k-chips.com>
> [ported to mainline, reworded commit message]
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <nicolas.frattaroli@...labora.com>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> index a8ad85feb68fbb7ec8d79602b16c47838ecb3c00..bec1930bebd87859a7e519cfc9f05e10b1c31e87 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/rockchip_thermal.c
> @@ -1061,6 +1061,22 @@ static void rk_tsadcv3_tshut_mode(int chn, void __iomem *regs,
>  	writel_relaxed(val_cru, regs + TSADCV3_HSHUT_CRU_INT_EN);
>  }
>  
> +static void rk_tsadcv4_tshut_mode(int chn, void __iomem *regs,
> +				  enum tshut_mode mode)
> +{
> +	u32 val_gpio, val_cru;
> +
> +	if (mode == TSHUT_MODE_GPIO) {
> +		val_gpio = TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN(chn) | TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN_MASK(chn);
> +		val_cru = TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN_MASK(chn);
> +	} else {
> +		val_cru = TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN(chn) | TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN_MASK(chn);
> +		val_gpio = TSADCV2_INT_SRC_EN_MASK(chn);
> +	}
> +	writel_relaxed(val_gpio, regs + TSADCV3_HSHUT_GPIO_INT_EN);
> +	writel_relaxed(val_cru, regs + TSADCV3_HSHUT_CRU_INT_EN);
> +}

This function is identical to rk_tsadcv3_tshut_mode() in mainline.

Should the v3 function be renamed to v4 in mainline to match vendor
kernel to avoid confusion?

> +
>  static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip px30_tsadc_data = {
>  	/* cpu, gpu */
>  	.chn_offset = 0,
> @@ -1284,6 +1300,28 @@ static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3568_tsadc_data = {
>  	},
>  };
>  
> +static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3576_tsadc_data = {
> +	/* top, big_core, little_core, ddr, npu, gpu */
> +	.chn_offset = 0,
> +	.chn_num = 6, /* six channels for tsadc */
> +	.tshut_mode = TSHUT_MODE_GPIO, /* default TSHUT via GPIO give PMIC */
> +	.tshut_polarity = TSHUT_LOW_ACTIVE, /* default TSHUT LOW ACTIVE */
> +	.tshut_temp = 95000,

Here the default is GPIO and 95 deg, in DT node the default is override
to CRU and 120 deg.

Any reason that is not the default here?

Regards,
Jonas

> +	.initialize = rk_tsadcv8_initialize,
> +	.irq_ack = rk_tsadcv4_irq_ack,
> +	.control = rk_tsadcv4_control,
> +	.get_temp = rk_tsadcv4_get_temp,
> +	.set_alarm_temp = rk_tsadcv3_alarm_temp,
> +	.set_tshut_temp = rk_tsadcv3_tshut_temp,
> +	.set_tshut_mode = rk_tsadcv4_tshut_mode,
> +	.table = {
> +		.id = rk3588_code_table,
> +		.length = ARRAY_SIZE(rk3588_code_table),
> +		.data_mask = TSADCV4_DATA_MASK,
> +		.mode = ADC_INCREMENT,
> +	},
> +};
> +
>  static const struct rockchip_tsadc_chip rk3588_tsadc_data = {
>  	/* top, big_core0, big_core1, little_core, center, gpu, npu */
>  	.chn_offset = 0,
> @@ -1342,6 +1380,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id of_rockchip_thermal_match[] = {
>  		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3568-tsadc",
>  		.data = (void *)&rk3568_tsadc_data,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3576-tsadc",
> +		.data = (void *)&rk3576_tsadc_data,
> +	},
>  	{
>  		.compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-tsadc",
>  		.data = (void *)&rk3588_tsadc_data,
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ