[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025031554-agreeing-ammonium-58aa@gregkh>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 10:32:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
Cc: Ethan Carter Edwards <ethan@...ancedwards.com>, tytso@....edu,
ernesto.mnd.fernandez@...il.com, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
sven@...npeter.dev, ernesto@...ellium.com, gargaditya08@...e.com,
willy@...radead.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] staging: apfs: init APFS module
On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 10:18:23AM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> > But I'll wait for an ACK from the filesystem developers before doing it
> > as having filesystem code in drivers/staging/ feels odd, and they kind
> > of need to know what's going on here for when they change api stuff.
>
> Sorry, I don't want new filesystems going through the generic staging
> tree. Next week during LSFMM we can discuss a filesystem specific
> staging tree that is directly maintained as part of fs so it's tightly
> integrated. We're going to talk about two new filesystems anyway.
Great, then I'll not worry about this patch series at all, thanks!
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists