[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87msdlhg2a.fsf@protonmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 02:20:44 +0000
From: Rahul Rameshbabu <sergeantsagara@...tonmail.com>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Julius Zint <julius@...t.sh>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] rust: hid: USB Monitor Control Class driver
On Fri, 14 Mar, 2025 15:41:02 +0100 "Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 5:58 PM Benjamin Tissoires <bentiss@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> skeletons are good for documentation, but not really for code review as
>> they can not compile.
>>
>> You should make this patch part of a documentation in
>> Documentation/hid/, and squash it with the next one (having a minimal
>> full driver instead of skeleton+fill in the voids).
>
> It could be part of the documentation of the `module_hid_driver!` for
> instance, like we have done for other of those macros.
>
> (In general, we try to use `Documentation/` for things that do not fit
> as documentation for any of the code "items".)
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
In general, I will add a lot more documentation in my next revision. For
example, I have a bunch of unsafe usage right now without any SAFETY
comments.
Thanks for the review,
Rahul Rameshbabu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists