[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025031716-decaf-overhead-c56c@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:00:04 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] regulator: dummy: convert to use the faux device
interface
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 10:13:21AM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Why are you resending my patch back to me?
> The dummy regulator driver does not need to create a platform device, it
> only did so because it was simple to do. Change it over to use the
> faux bus instead as this is NOT a real platform device, and it makes
> the code even smaller than before.
>
> Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Message-Id: <2025021027-outclass-stress-59dd@...gkh>
> (sudeep.holla: Made dummy_regulator_driver static)
So this is a new version?
And as was pointed out, this is already in my tree, and there's a
conflict in linux-next with it.
confused,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists