[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250317132922.2698513-1-florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 06:29:22 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
To: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>
Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Stanislav Jakubek <stano.jakubek@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/10] ARM: dts: Drop DTS for BCM59056 PMU
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
On Tue, 04 Mar 2025 07:20:34 +0100, Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> The BCM59056 PMU has its own separate DTSI, meant to be included
> in a DTS file after defining the pmu node on some I2C bus.
>
> This seems rather unintuitive; drop the DTS in favor of adding the
> BCM59056 PMU node directly into the device DTS files.
>
> If the amount of subdevices supported by the BCM590xx grows, and
> a common device tree turns out to be beneficial, it can be reintroduced
> in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Artur Weber <aweber.kernel@...il.com>
> ---
Applied to https://github.com/Broadcom/stblinux/commits/devicetree/next, thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists