[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250317170602.GE6888@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:06:02 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Righi <arighi@...dia.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>,
Luigi De Matteis <ldematteis123@...il.com>, paulmck@...nel.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/8] sched/ext: Add a DL server for sched_ext tasks
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:57:19AM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:31:01AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 07:15:27PM -0400, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > > If so, that will not handle the case where the system has both
> > > FAIR and EXT tasks in the mix (EXT has a partial mode where certain tasks can be
> > > made EXT with certain others left as FAIR) and FAIR runs 100% and starves EXT.
> >
> > Well, you did not mention that issue, you only babbled about RT.
> >
> > I did point out that issue with ext, and TJ said this mixed mode wasn't
> > really meant to be used or somesuch.
>
> It's true that most of the current use cases don't use mixed mode. That
> said, some folks are interested in it and if we can prevent starvation from
> fair saturating CPUs in mixed mode with a DL server, that'd be really nice.
> Would it be possible to toggle the reservations depending on the ext's
> operation mode?
Yeah, that should be doable.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists