linux-kernel - Re: [net-next,v3,2/2] net: phy: realtek: Add support for PHY LEDs on RTL8211E

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9hbKy6SuARPvmXf@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:26:03 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Michael Klein <michael@...sekall.de>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net-next,v3,2/2] net: phy: realtek: Add support for PHY LEDs on
 RTL8211E

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:23:07PM +0100, Michael Klein wrote:
> I don't think this needs to be atomic at all, as the phydev lock is held by
> the one and only caller (phy_led_hw_control_get()).
> 
> rtl8211f_led_hw_control_get() also uses set_bit(). Should I change those
> also to __set_bit() in a separate patch while I'm at it?

Yes please.

Thanks!

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!