[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9hbwkqwDKlyPsqv@google.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:28:34 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SVM: Fix SNP AP destroy race with VMRUN
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> On 3/17/25 12:20, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > An AP destroy request for a target vCPU is typically followed by an
> > RMPADJUST to remove the VMSA attribute from the page currently being
> > used as the VMSA for the target vCPU. This can result in a vCPU that
> > is about to VMRUN to exit with #VMEXIT_INVALID.
> >
> > This usually does not happen as APs are typically sitting in HLT when
> > being destroyed and therefore the vCPU thread is not running at the time.
> > However, if HLT is allowed inside the VM, then the vCPU could be about to
> > VMRUN when the VMSA attribute is removed from the VMSA page, resulting in
> > a #VMEXIT_INVALID when the vCPU actually issues the VMRUN and causing the
> > guest to crash. An RMPADJUST against an in-use (already running) VMSA
> > results in a #NPF for the vCPU issuing the RMPADJUST, so the VMSA
> > attribute cannot be changed until the VMRUN for target vCPU exits. The
> > Qemu command line option '-overcommit cpu-pm=on' is an example of allowing
> > HLT inside the guest.
> >
> > Use kvm_test_request() to ensure that the target vCPU sees the AP destroy
> > request before returning to the initiating vCPU.
> >
> > Fixes: e366f92ea99e ("KVM: SEV: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event")
> > Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
>
> Sean,
>
> If you're ok with this approach for the fix, this patch may need to be
> adjusted given your series around AP creation fixes, unless you want to
> put this as an early patch in your series. Let me know what you'd like
> to do.
This is unsafe as it requires userspace to do KVM_RUN _and_ for the vCPU to get
far enough along to consume the request.
Very off-the-cuff, but I assume KVM_REQ_UPDATE_PROTECTED_GUEST_STATE just needs
to be annotated with KVM_REQUEST_WAIT.
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 04e6c5604bc3..67abfe97c600 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -124,7 +124,8 @@
KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(31, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP)
#define KVM_REQ_HV_TLB_FLUSH \
KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(32, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT | KVM_REQUEST_NO_WAKEUP)
-#define KVM_REQ_UPDATE_PROTECTED_GUEST_STATE KVM_ARCH_REQ(34)
+#define KVM_REQ_UPDATE_PROTECTED_GUEST_STATE \
+ KVM_ARCH_REQ_FLAGS(34, KVM_REQUEST_WAIT)
#define CR0_RESERVED_BITS \
(~(unsigned long)(X86_CR0_PE | X86_CR0_MP | X86_CR0_EM | X86_CR0_TS \
Powered by blists - more mailing lists