[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250317173216.GGZ9hcoDICYl1fBtBG@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:32:16 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] x86: treewide: Introduce
x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon()
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 05:47:17PM +0100, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
> The pattern to check if an x86 vendor is AMD or HYGON (or not both) is
> pretty common. Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon() at <asm/processor.h>
So if we need to check "intel too", we do
x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon_or_intel?
Nah, this is silly.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists