lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49E87DED-AE70-4A58-BE74-670C369C60B3@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:34:46 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/29] x86: treewide: Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon()

On March 17, 2025 11:10:27 AM PDT, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com> wrote:
>On 17/03/2025 5:48 pm, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:32:16PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 05:47:17PM +0100, Ahmed S. Darwish wrote:
>>>> The pattern to check if an x86 vendor is AMD or HYGON (or not both) is
>>>> pretty common.  Introduce x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon() at <asm/processor.h>
>>> So if we need to check "intel too", we do
>>>
>>> x86_vendor_amd_or_hygon_or_intel?
>>>
>>> Nah, this is silly.
>> Would it make more sense to have a Zen1 feature and check that instead?
>>
>> Because, IIRC Hygon is simply a Zen1 copy.
>
>AMD and Hygon the most often compared together, because the Hygon CPUs
>are so close to Zen1/2.
>
>One trick you can do to make this easier is to define vendors IDs as (1U
><< $N).  This leaves all existing code with equality checks working, but
>also lets you check "vendor & (AMD | HYGON)" rather more efficiently.
>
>~Andrew

Jinx.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ