linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mux: Fix coverity issue, unchecked return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <174224057580.315737.13134675216872556124.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 19:42:55 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: skhan@...uxfoundation.org, Sergio Perez Gonzalez <sperezglz@...il.com>
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: spi-mux: Fix coverity issue, unchecked return
 value

On Sat, 15 Mar 2025 23:46:06 -0600, Sergio Perez Gonzalez wrote:
> The return value of spi_setup() is not captured within
> spi_mux_select() and it is assumed to be always success.
> 
> CID: 1638374
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] spi: spi-mux: Fix coverity issue, unchecked return value
      commit: 5a5fc308418aca275a898d638bc38c093d101855

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark