linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: gpu: arm,mali-midgard: add exynos7870-mali compatible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <565d6379-06b8-402f-b567-38515a521658@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:17:44 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>,
 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
 Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
 David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: Sergey Lisov <sleirsgoevy@...il.com>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] dt-bindings: gpu: arm,mali-midgard: add
 exynos7870-mali compatible

On 17/03/2025 20:20, Kaustabh Chakraborty wrote:
> Exynos7870 SoC uses the ARM Mali T830 GPU, document its compatible
> string with the appropriate fallback. The T830 compatible is already
> defined in the panfrost driver, but was commented out as it was unused.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kaustabh Chakraborty <kauschluss@...root.org>
> ---
> This patch series is a part of Exynos7870 upstreaming.
> ---

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
"received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof