linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] netconsole: allow selection of egress interface via MAC address

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9iJZBh5ZFq3wC6s@dev-ushankar.dev.purestorage.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:43:16 -0600
From: Uday Shankar <ushankar@...estorage.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
	Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/2] netconsole: allow selection of egress
 interface via MAC address

On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 08:37:16PM +0100, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:13:01 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:11:18PM -0700, Uday Shankar wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 02:40:35PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:  
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>  
> > > 
> > > Hey, since this has gotten quiet for a while, just wanted to confirm
> > > that there's no action needed from my end? Is this in the queue for
> > > net-next?  
> > 
> > It seems that this series has been marked as Changes Requested in
> > patchwork, which may explain the lack of progress. But that designation
> > doesn't seem correct to me. So let's see if this can move this series
> > back into the queue for the maintainers.
> 
> Unclear why the designation was chosen, indeed, but let's get this
> reposted per normal process. The posting is a month old.

Sounds good, I've posted a v6 which is listed at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=943246 as
"new" even though it has several reviews from maintainers. Anything else
for me to do?