[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d50a14a-edfb-410d-840e-17876806a63b@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 21:56:39 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Meta kernel team <kernel-team@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] memcg: use __mod_memcg_state in drain_obj_stock
On 3/15/25 18:49, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> For non-PREEMPT_RT kernels, drain_obj_stock() is always called with irq
> disabled, so we can use __mod_memcg_state() instead of
> mod_memcg_state(). For PREEMPT_RT, we need to add memcg_stats_[un]lock
> in __mod_memcg_state().
>
> Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
> Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
I've asked in the RFC and from Sebastian's answer I think my question was
misunderstod, so let me try again.
After this patch we'll have from mod_memcg_state():
mod_memcg_state()
local_irq_save(flags);
__mod_memcg_state()
memcg_stats_lock(); <- new and unnecessary?
Instead of modifying __mod_memcg_state() we could be more targetted and just
do in drain_obj_stock():
memcg_stats_lock();
__mod_memcg_state();
memcg_stats_unlock();
Am I missing something?
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 3c4de384b5a0..dfe9c2eb7816 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -707,10 +707,12 @@ void __mod_memcg_state(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, enum memcg_stat_item idx,
> if (WARN_ONCE(BAD_STAT_IDX(i), "%s: missing stat item %d\n", __func__, idx))
> return;
>
> + memcg_stats_lock();
> __this_cpu_add(memcg->vmstats_percpu->state[i], val);
> val = memcg_state_val_in_pages(idx, val);
> memcg_rstat_updated(memcg, val);
> trace_mod_memcg_state(memcg, idx, val);
> + memcg_stats_unlock();
> }
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG_V1
> @@ -2845,7 +2847,7 @@ static void drain_obj_stock(struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock)
>
> memcg = get_mem_cgroup_from_objcg(old);
>
> - mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_KMEM, -nr_pages);
> + __mod_memcg_state(memcg, MEMCG_KMEM, -nr_pages);
> memcg1_account_kmem(memcg, -nr_pages);
> if (!mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
> memcg_uncharge(memcg, nr_pages);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists