linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9ilUiy8IFt719kz@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 23:42:26 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] sched: Make CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG features unconditional


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> 
> * Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> 
> > Ingo, please fix your mail setup..
> > 
> > These were all in my spam-box, because you used
> > 
> >     From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > 
> > but sent it using gmail, so the DKIM signature looks like
> > 
> >     DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> >         d=gmail.com; [...]
> > 
> > and then that results in
> > 
> >        dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=QUARANTINE)
> > header.from=kernel.org;
> > 
> > because the DKIM signature - while a valid signature for gmail - does
> > not match the kernel.org signature.
> > 
> > So you need to use 'mail.kernel.org' to send the email to get the
> > right signature, as documented in
> > 
> >     https://korg.docs.kernel.org/mail.html
> > 
> > otherwise any sane setup will mark all those things as spam.
> 
> Sorry about that!
> 
> (And I just sent out another series with the same flawed script ...)
> 
> I thought I have fixed that all up, but apparently only for my main 
> Mutt setup, not for some of my older Git-patchbomb scripts that used 
> .gitconfig's [sendemail]. :-/

BTW., the reason I didn't notice this sooner is because I read lkml via 
a local maildir representation of the Lore Git archive (all hail Konstantin),
where these mails showed up just fine.

Thanks,

	Ingo