lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878qp3e0ii.fsf@trenco.lwn.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:49:09 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@...mhuis.info>
Cc: workflows@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Laurent Pinchart
 <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Simona Vetter
 <simona.vetter@...ll.ch>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
 <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] docs: clarify rules wrt tagging other people

Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> writes:

> Sorry for being slow ... but also, I guess, for not communicating my
> point very well.  My concern wasn't about somebody not wanting to appear
> in the repository at all; it was more with somebody not wanting their
> tag in a specific patch where they had not offered it.
>
> It seems I'm the only one who is worried about this, though.  It seems
> like we should go ahead and get this change in before the merge window
> hits.

OK, I have gone ahead and applied it ... though I'm still not 100%
comfortable with the wording as it is... :)

Thanks,

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ