linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: add option to build without ACPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f02b9127-fec1-49c7-9cc1-f286cc3adca7@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:31:23 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
 David E Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
 platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: add option to build
 without ACPI



On 14/3/2025 7:56 pm, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:

> Hi both,
> 
> The original commit went through net-next tree so I cannot take this into
> pdx86 tree until after the merge window. It seems low impact enough that
> coordinating with the netdev might not be worth the effort.
> 
> To get it going through net-next tree, you'd need to submit v3 so that in
> addition to the current receipients, all relevant netdev people & ML are
> included as receipients. But I'd be fine if you leave it until after the
> merge window and I can then handle it then.
> 

Hi Ilpo,

I believe we can leave the patch until after the merge window.
This approach would simplify the merging process without needing assistance 
from the netdev maintainer for the platform code.

Thank you for your support.