lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANXhq0oz72vtaAxKH02ccJg+JHO9JnWbWhfwdDAgNd14ghNMCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:29:28 +0800
From: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>
To: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, 
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org, 
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, 
	"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, 
	Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, 
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, 
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, 
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, 
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, 
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, alistair.francis@....com, 
	richard.henderson@...aro.org, jim.shu@...ive.com, andybnac@...il.com, 
	kito.cheng@...ive.com, charlie@...osinc.com, atishp@...osinc.com, 
	evan@...osinc.com, cleger@...osinc.com, alexghiti@...osinc.com, 
	samitolvanen@...gle.com, broonie@...nel.org, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/28] riscv: Implements arch agnostic indirect branch
 tracking prctls

On Sat, Mar 15, 2025 at 6:51 AM Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> prctls implemented are:
> PR_SET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS, PR_GET_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS and
> PR_LOCK_INDIR_BR_LP_STATUS
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@...osinc.com>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h | 16 +++++++-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S        |  2 +-
>  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c      |  5 +++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c      | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
> index c4dcd256f19a..a8cec7c14d1d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/usercfi.h
> @@ -16,7 +16,9 @@ struct kernel_clone_args;
>  struct cfi_status {
>         unsigned long ubcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for backward cfi. */
>         unsigned long ubcfi_locked : 1;
> -       unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) - 2);
> +       unsigned long ufcfi_en : 1; /* Enable for forward cfi. Note that ELP goes in sstatus */
> +       unsigned long ufcfi_locked : 1;
> +       unsigned long rsvd : ((sizeof(unsigned long) * 8) - 4);
>         unsigned long user_shdw_stk; /* Current user shadow stack pointer */
>         unsigned long shdw_stk_base; /* Base address of shadow stack */
>         unsigned long shdw_stk_size; /* size of shadow stack */
> @@ -33,6 +35,10 @@ bool is_shstk_locked(struct task_struct *task);
>  bool is_shstk_allocated(struct task_struct *task);
>  void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task);
>  void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
> +bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task);
> +bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task);
> +void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
> +void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task);
>
>  #define PR_SHADOW_STACK_SUPPORTED_STATUS_MASK (PR_SHADOW_STACK_ENABLE)
>
> @@ -58,6 +64,14 @@ void set_shstk_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable);
>
>  #define set_shstk_status(task, enable)
>
> +#define is_indir_lp_enabled(task) false
> +
> +#define is_indir_lp_locked(task) false
> +
> +#define set_indir_lp_status(task, enable)
> +
> +#define set_indir_lp_lock(task)
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_USER_CFI */
>
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index 68c99124ea55..00494b54ff4a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(handle_exception)
>          * Disable the FPU/Vector to detect illegal usage of floating point
>          * or vector in kernel space.
>          */
> -       li t0, SR_SUM | SR_FS_VS
> +       li t0, SR_SUM | SR_FS_VS | SR_ELP
>
>         REG_L s0, TASK_TI_USER_SP(tp)
>         csrrc s1, CSR_STATUS, t0
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> index cd11667593fe..4587201dd81d 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/process.c
> @@ -160,6 +160,11 @@ void start_thread(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long pc,
>         set_shstk_status(current, false);
>         set_shstk_base(current, 0, 0);
>         set_active_shstk(current, 0);
> +       /*
> +        * disable indirect branch tracking on exec.
> +        * libc will enable it later via prctl.
> +        */
> +       set_indir_lp_status(current, false);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
>         regs->status &= ~SR_UXL;
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
> index b93b324eed26..7937bcef9271 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/usercfi.c
> @@ -72,6 +72,35 @@ void set_shstk_lock(struct task_struct *task)
>         task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ubcfi_locked = 1;
>  }
>
> +bool is_indir_lp_enabled(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +       return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en ? true : false;
> +}
> +
> +bool is_indir_lp_locked(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +       return task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked ? true : false;
> +}
> +
> +void set_indir_lp_status(struct task_struct *task, bool enable)
> +{
> +       if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr())
> +               return;
> +
> +       task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_en = enable ? 1 : 0;
> +
> +       if (enable)
> +               task->thread.envcfg |= ENVCFG_LPE;
> +       else
> +               task->thread.envcfg &= ~ENVCFG_LPE;
> +
> +       csr_write(CSR_ENVCFG, task->thread.envcfg);
> +}
> +
> +void set_indir_lp_lock(struct task_struct *task)
> +{
> +       task->thread_info.user_cfi_state.ufcfi_locked = 1;
> +}
>  /*
>   * If size is 0, then to be compatible with regular stack we want it to be as big as
>   * regular stack. Else PAGE_ALIGN it and return back
> @@ -372,3 +401,53 @@ int arch_lock_shadow_stack_status(struct task_struct *task,
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int arch_get_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long __user *status)
> +{
> +       unsigned long fcfi_status = 0;
> +
> +       if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr())
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* indirect branch tracking is enabled on the task or not */
> +       fcfi_status |= (is_indir_lp_enabled(t) ? PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE : 0);
> +
> +       return copy_to_user(status, &fcfi_status, sizeof(fcfi_status)) ? -EFAULT : 0;
> +}
> +
> +int arch_set_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *t, unsigned long status)
> +{
> +       bool enable_indir_lp = false;
> +
> +       if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr())
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* indirect branch tracking is locked and further can't be modified by user */
> +       if (is_indir_lp_locked(t))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* Reject unknown flags */
> +       if (status & ~PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       enable_indir_lp = (status & PR_INDIR_BR_LP_ENABLE) ? true : false;
> +       set_indir_lp_status(t, enable_indir_lp);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int arch_lock_indir_br_lp_status(struct task_struct *task,
> +                                unsigned long arg)
> +{
> +       /*
> +        * If indirect branch tracking is not supported or not enabled on task,
> +        * nothing to lock here
> +        */
> +       if (!cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr() ||
> +           !is_indir_lp_enabled(task) || arg != 0)
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       set_indir_lp_lock(task);
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
>
LGTM

Reviewed-by: Zong Li <zong.li@...ive.com>

> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ