linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250317101533.2582624-2-wangyuquan1236@phytium.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:15:32 +0800
From: Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>
To: Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	rppt@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	david@...hat.com,
	bfaccini@...dia.com,
	rafael@...nel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org,
	dave@...olabs.net,
	dave.jiang@...el.com,
	alison.schofield@...el.com,
	vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
	ira.weiny@...el.com,
	rrichter@....com,
	haibo1.xu@...el.com
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	chenbaozi@...tium.com.cn,
	Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: numa_memblks: introduce numa_add_reserved_memblk

With numa_add_reserved_memblk(), kernel could add numa_memblk into
numa_reserved_meminfo directly.

In previous, such process relies on numa_add_memblk() adding to
numa_meminfo list first and then uses numa_move_tail_memblk() to
move one from numa_meminfo to numa_reserved_meminfo.

Signed-off-by: Yuquan Wang <wangyuquan1236@...tium.com.cn>
---
 include/linux/numa_memblks.h |  1 +
 mm/numa_memblks.c            | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
index dd85613cdd86..991076cba7c5 100644
--- a/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
+++ b/include/linux/numa_memblks.h
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct numa_meminfo {
 };
 
 int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
+int __init numa_add_reserved_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end);
 void __init numa_remove_memblk_from(int idx, struct numa_meminfo *mi);
 
 int __init numa_cleanup_meminfo(struct numa_meminfo *mi);
diff --git a/mm/numa_memblks.c b/mm/numa_memblks.c
index ff4054f4334d..e70c76cc46dd 100644
--- a/mm/numa_memblks.c
+++ b/mm/numa_memblks.c
@@ -200,6 +200,22 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
 	return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_meminfo);
 }
 
+/**
+ * numa_add_reserved_memblk - Add one numa_memblk to numa_reserved_meminfo
+ * @nid: NUMA node ID of the new memblk
+ * @start: Start address of the new memblk
+ * @end: End address of the new memblk
+ *
+ * Add a new memblk to the numa_reserved_meminfo.
+ *
+ * RETURNS:
+ * 0 on success, -errno on failure.
+ */
+int __init numa_add_reserved_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
+{
+	return numa_add_memblk_to(nid, start, end, &numa_reserved_meminfo);
+}
+
 /**
  * numa_cleanup_meminfo - Cleanup a numa_meminfo
  * @mi: numa_meminfo to clean up
-- 
2.34.1