linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z9f6vYanql2xqbJw@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:34:54 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit

On Fri 2025-03-14 16:50:43, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:45 PM Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:29:40PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > > On Fri 2025-03-07 06:27:33, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > > This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> > > > being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
> > > > addition to the enclosed patch, please consider this an RFC on the
> > > > removal of the "Test Module" kselftest machinery.
> > > >
> > > > Tamir Duberstein (6):
> > > >       scanf: implicate test line in failure messages
> > > >       scanf: remove redundant debug logs
> > > >       scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
> > > >       scanf: break kunit into test cases
> > >
> > > Kees, could you please take the above 5 patches as well
> > > via the tree moving the KUNIT tests to lib/tests ?
> >
> > I think you mean 4? Sure!
> 
> 4 by my count as well :)
> 
> Please let me know if you'd like me to respin with conflicts resolved!

Yes, I meant 4. I am sorry for the confusion.

And the list of pushed patches in the later reply looks good.

Thanks for help.

Best Regards,
Petr