[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2503171135460.4236@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:36:23 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] objtool: Improve __noreturn annotation warning
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:29:01PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > Clarify what needs to be done to resolve the missing __noreturn warning.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt | 12 +++++-------
> > tools/objtool/check.c | 2 +-
> > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt b/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt
> > index 7c3ee959b63c..87950a7aaa17 100644
> > --- a/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt
> > +++ b/tools/objtool/Documentation/objtool.txt
> > @@ -319,14 +319,12 @@ the objtool maintainers.
> > a just a bad person, you can tell objtool to ignore it. See the
> > "Adding exceptions" section below.
> >
> > - If it's not actually in a callable function (e.g. kernel entry code),
> > - change ENDPROC to END.
>
> Did you mean to delete that?
I would say so but it should go to the next patch 4/13 alongside the other
doc updates.
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists