[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9gGsVt872Gdodh2@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:25:37 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rt-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/9] sched: Add a generic function to return the
preemption string.
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> On 2025-03-17 11:18:37 [+0100], Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Yeah, that's a valid concern.
> >
> > The thing is, CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is mostly meaningless these days - all
> > major distributions enable it because of the statistics are useful for
> > system administration, tooling and general software development.
> >
> > So we should enable it permanently and remove the #ifdeffery. I'll send
> > out a series to do so soon.
>
> If that is the way to go, the please Cc me and I rebase on top of it.
Let's do it the other way around - your series is mature enough I
think, and the merge window is close.
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists