| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20250317113013.182359-1-ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 12:29:48 +0100
From: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To: x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/asm: Use asm_inline() instead of asm() in __untagged_addr()
Use asm_inline() to instruct the compiler that the size of asm()
is the minimum size of one instruction, ignoring how many instructions
the compiler thinks it is. ALTERNATIVE macro that expands to several
pseudo directives causes instruction length estimate to count
more than 20 instructions.
bloat-o-meter reports minimal code size increase
(x86_64 defconfig with CONFIG_ADDRESS_MASKING, gcc-14.2.1):
add/remove: 2/2 grow/shrink: 5/1 up/down: 2365/-1995 (370)
Function old new delta
-----------------------------------------------------
do_get_mempolicy - 1449 +1449
copy_nodes_to_user - 226 +226
__x64_sys_get_mempolicy 35 213 +178
syscall_user_dispatch_set_config 157 332 +175
__ia32_sys_get_mempolicy 31 206 +175
set_syscall_user_dispatch 29 181 +152
__do_sys_mremap 2073 2083 +10
sp_insert 133 117 -16
task_set_syscall_user_dispatch 172 - -172
kernel_get_mempolicy 1807 - -1807
Total: Before=21423151, After=21423521, chg +0.00%
The code size increase is due to the compiler inlining
more functions that inline untagged_addr(), e.g:
task_set_syscall_user_dispatch() is now fully inlined in
set_syscall_user_dispatch():
000000000010b7e0 <set_syscall_user_dispatch>:
10b7e0: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
10b7e4: 49 89 c8 mov %rcx,%r8
10b7e7: 48 89 d1 mov %rdx,%rcx
10b7ea: 48 89 f2 mov %rsi,%rdx
10b7ed: 48 89 fe mov %rdi,%rsi
10b7f0: 65 48 8b 3d 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0(%rip),%rdi
10b7f7: 00
10b7f8: e9 03 fe ff ff jmp 10b600 <task_set_syscall_user_dispatch>
that after inlining becomes:
000000000010b730 <set_syscall_user_dispatch>:
10b730: f3 0f 1e fa endbr64
10b734: 65 48 8b 05 00 00 00 mov %gs:0x0(%rip),%rax
10b73b: 00
10b73c: 48 85 ff test %rdi,%rdi
10b73f: 74 54 je 10b795 <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x65>
10b741: 48 83 ff 01 cmp $0x1,%rdi
10b745: 74 06 je 10b74d <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x1d>
10b747: b8 ea ff ff ff mov $0xffffffea,%eax
10b74c: c3 ret
10b74d: 48 85 f6 test %rsi,%rsi
10b750: 75 7b jne 10b7cd <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x9d>
10b752: 48 85 c9 test %rcx,%rcx
10b755: 74 1a je 10b771 <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x41>
10b757: 48 89 cf mov %rcx,%rdi
10b75a: 49 b8 ef cd ab 89 67 movabs $0x123456789abcdef,%r8
10b761: 45 23 01
10b764: 90 nop
10b765: 90 nop
10b766: 90 nop
10b767: 90 nop
10b768: 90 nop
10b769: 90 nop
10b76a: 90 nop
10b76b: 90 nop
10b76c: 49 39 f8 cmp %rdi,%r8
10b76f: 72 6e jb 10b7df <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0xaf>
10b771: 48 89 88 48 08 00 00 mov %rcx,0x848(%rax)
10b778: 48 89 b0 50 08 00 00 mov %rsi,0x850(%rax)
10b77f: 48 89 90 58 08 00 00 mov %rdx,0x858(%rax)
10b786: c6 80 60 08 00 00 00 movb $0x0,0x860(%rax)
10b78d: f0 80 48 08 20 lock orb $0x20,0x8(%rax)
10b792: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
10b794: c3 ret
10b795: 48 09 d1 or %rdx,%rcx
10b798: 48 09 f1 or %rsi,%rcx
10b79b: 75 aa jne 10b747 <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x17>
10b79d: 48 c7 80 48 08 00 00 movq $0x0,0x848(%rax)
10b7a4: 00 00 00 00
10b7a8: 48 c7 80 50 08 00 00 movq $0x0,0x850(%rax)
10b7af: 00 00 00 00
10b7b3: 48 c7 80 58 08 00 00 movq $0x0,0x858(%rax)
10b7ba: 00 00 00 00
10b7be: c6 80 60 08 00 00 00 movb $0x0,0x860(%rax)
10b7c5: f0 80 60 08 df lock andb $0xdf,0x8(%rax)
10b7ca: 31 c0 xor %eax,%eax
10b7cc: c3 ret
10b7cd: 48 8d 3c 16 lea (%rsi,%rdx,1),%rdi
10b7d1: 48 39 fe cmp %rdi,%rsi
10b7d4: 0f 82 78 ff ff ff jb 10b752 <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x22>
10b7da: e9 68 ff ff ff jmp 10b747 <set_syscall_user_dispatch+0x17>
10b7df: b8 f2 ff ff ff mov $0xfffffff2,%eax
10b7e4: c3 ret
Please note a series of NOPs that get replaced with an alternative:
11f0: 65 48 23 05 00 00 00 and %gs:0x0(%rip),%rax
11f7: 00
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
---
v2: Include asm dumps of inlining in the commit message.
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
index c52f0133425b..3c1bec3a0405 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -26,8 +26,8 @@ extern unsigned long USER_PTR_MAX;
*/
static inline unsigned long __untagged_addr(unsigned long addr)
{
- asm (ALTERNATIVE("",
- "and " __percpu_arg([mask]) ", %[addr]", X86_FEATURE_LAM)
+ asm_inline (ALTERNATIVE("", "and " __percpu_arg([mask]) ", %[addr]",
+ X86_FEATURE_LAM)
: [addr] "+r" (addr)
: [mask] "m" (__my_cpu_var(tlbstate_untag_mask)));
--
2.48.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists