lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9gQMPjjCt9Rn4lH@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:06:08 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>
To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>,
	Emanuele Ghidoli <ghidoliemanuele@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
	Emanuele Ghidoli <emanuele.ghidoli@...adex.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	soc@...nel.org,
	Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] platform: toradex: Add toradex embedded
 controller

On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:39:14AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 17-Mar-25 11:08, Francesco Dolcini wrote:

...

> But if Andy and Ilpo are happy to take this as a more monolithic
> driver under drivers/platform/aarch64 I'm not going to nack that
> approach.

I'm okay with the choice as long as it's suffice the purpose.
I agree that aarch64 maybe not a good choice after all, but
we should start from somewhere. Later on we can move to agnostic
folder if needed. The question here is more about MFD/not-MFD.
If the former becomes the case, it would need to be under drivers/mfd
as Lee asked for that (or even required).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ