lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025031852-angelfish-mouth-f455@gregkh>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:37:08 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>, Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
	Xuerui Wang <kernel@...0n.name>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
	R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1&6.6 1/3] sign-file,extract-cert: move common SSL
 helper functions to a header

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 09:58:26PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Greg,
> 
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 9:25 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 07:01:22PM +0800, Huacai Chen wrote:
> > > From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > commit 300e6d4116f956b035281ec94297dc4dc8d4e1d3 upstream.
> > >
> > > Couple error handling helpers are repeated in both tools, so
> > > move them to a common header.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@...hat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > > Tested-by: R Nageswara Sastry <rnsastry@...ux.ibm.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@...pa.dev>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
> > > ---
> >
> > Is this "v2" as well?  the threading is all confusing here.  This is
> > what my inbox looks like right now:
> Yes, this is also V2, I'm very sorry to confuse you.

Great!  Please resend them all as a "v3" so I'm not confused :)

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ