linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i3c: master: svc: Fix i3c_master_get_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202503181558316ef27a06@mail.local>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 16:58:31 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@...il.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, Frank.Li@....com,
	linux-i3c@...ts.infradead.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i3c: master: svc: Fix i3c_master_get_free_addr
 return check

On 18/03/2025 14:51:49+0000, Qasim Ijaz wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 11:46:29PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:33:04 +0800, Stanley Chu wrote:
> > > The return value of i3c_master_get_free_addr is assigned to a variable
> > > with wrong type, so it can't be negative. Use a signed integer for the
> > > return value. If the value is negative, break the process and propagate
> > > the error code.
> > > 
> > > This commit also fixes the uninitialized symbol 'dyn_addr', reported
> > > by Smatch static checker.
> > > 
> > > [...]
> > 
> > Applied, thanks!
> > 
> > [1/1] i3c: master: svc: Fix i3c_master_get_free_addr return check
> >       https://git.kernel.org/abelloni/c/d6cb667b8e15
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > 
> > -- 
> > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
> > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> > https://bootlin.com
> 
> Hi Alexandre,
> 
> I sent a fix for this issue on the 9th March, which is before the patch
> Stanley sent which was sent on the 10th March.
> 
> You can view my orignal patch here:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250309164314.15039-1-qasdev00@gmail.com/
> 

The issue is that you then resent the patch with the same topic which
superseded your original patch. But the resend was missing a blank line
so I could not apply it immediately and I later applied the other one.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com