linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: tegra210-quad: use device_reset_optional() instead of device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7f2ac489-51e5-4798-a38a-a8b7ef3d4c83@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 18:35:18 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...ian.org>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
	Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@...dia.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rmikey@...a.com, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] spi: tegra210-quad: use device_reset_optional()
 instead of device_reset()

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:29:26AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 05:34:55PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 10:02:47AM -0700, Breno Leitao wrote:

> > > Regarding this patchset, I understand that patch #1 is not ideal as
> > > discussed above, what about patch 2 and 3?

> > If I didn't say anything they're probably fine.

> Do you want me to resend those two separately, or, is this thread
> enough?

Please resend.  I think I was anticipating a new version of this patch
with a clarified changelog and some rework to tone down the logging
that's generated similar to the other patches rather than just silently
ignoring the lack of a reset controller.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)