[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250318185519.GGZ9nBl2VUP4ysb-tZ@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:55:19 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Kaplan <david.kaplan@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
Derek Manwaring <derekmn@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: MMIO and VERW
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 11:15:15AM -0700, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> :D Totally agree. A machine readable format is here:
> https://github.com/intel/Intel-affected-processor-list/blob/main/Intel_affected_processor_list.csv
Nice.
> Likely yes, I will give this a shot and see how it compares with the
> currrent implementation. Thanks for the suggestion.
Thanks!
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists