[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kjTTAsQTG4S4WuQi0Udnb+2v=gK8mOTWBhprMsGev3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 20:06:09 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@...il.com>
Cc: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.almeida@...labora.com, dakr@...nel.org, robin.murphy@....com,
aliceryhl@...gle.com, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@...ton.me>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Valentin Obst <kernel@...entinobst.de>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>, airlied@...hat.com,
"open list:DMA MAPPING HELPERS" <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 03/11] samples: rust: add Rust dma test sample driver
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 7:42 PM Abdiel Janulgue
<abdiel.janulgue@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Changing `dma_read!`/`dma_write!` to return `Result` is probably not a
> trivial change, would it be okay to have this fixed in a subsequent patch?
Yeah, if you feel the need for a v16, I would suggest focusing on
changing whatever is essential only, since I will be applying the
first part of the series soon.
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists