linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6758e958-a4d7-48b8-83ff-4bcb98f87340@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:10:19 -0700
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar
	<mingo@...hat.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, "Arnaldo Carvalho
 de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland
	<mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin
	<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, "Ian
 Rogers" <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, "Kan
 Liang" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Rafael J
 . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski
	<luto@...nel.org>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Jean Delvare
	<jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Zhang Rui
	<rui.zhang@...el.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>, "David
 Laight" <david.laight.linux@...il.com>, Dapeng Mi
	<dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers

On 3/18/2025 11:35 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

>> Most patches have review tags now or are simple enough that they might
>> not need one. Patch 11 can probably use another look.
> 
> LGTM, but I've extended the Cc: list to make more people aware.
> 
> (I did the same for some of the other patches that could use extra eyes.)
> 

Appreciate it.

>> Patch 14 is the only one that has a minor change. Seeking additional
>> input before spinning another revision.
> 
> I've applied the first 13 patches to tip:x86/cpu to help move this 
> along. I fixed a handful of typos, but haven't noticed any functional 
> problems so far, so unless there's problems in -next this might be OK
> for the merge window. (Famous last words.)
> 

Many thanks.. Fingers crossed!

-Sohil