lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2680900.1742336740@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 22:25:40 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Alex Markuze <amarkuze@...hat.com>,
    "slava@...eyko.com" <slava@...eyko.com>,
    "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
    "idryomov@...il.com" <idryomov@...il.com>,
    "jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
    "linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
    "ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
    "dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn" <dongsheng.yang@...ystack.cn>,
    "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/35] libceph, rbd: Convert some page arrays to ceph_databuf

Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com> wrote:

> >  	/*
> >  	 * The response data for a STAT call consists of:
> > @@ -2118,14 +2118,12 @@ static int rbd_osd_setup_stat(struct ceph_osd_request *osd_req, int which)
> >  	 *         le32 tv_nsec;
> >  	 *     } mtime;
> >  	 */
> > -	pages = ceph_alloc_page_vector(1, GFP_NOIO);
> > -	if (IS_ERR(pages))
> > -		return PTR_ERR(pages);
> > +	dbuf = ceph_databuf_reply_alloc(1, 8 + sizeof(struct ceph_timespec), GFP_NOIO);
> 
> What this 8 + sizeof(struct ceph_timespec) means? Why do we use 8 here? :)

See the comment that's partially obscured by the patch hunk line:

	/*
	 * The response data for a STAT call consists of:
	 *     le64 length;
	 *     struct {
	 *         le32 tv_sec;
	 *         le32 tv_nsec;
	 *     } mtime;
	 */

If you want to clean up and formalise all of these sorts of things, you might
need to invest in an rpcgen-like tool.  I've occasionally toyed with the idea
for afs in the kernel (I've hand-written all the marshalling/unmarshalling
code in fs/afs/fsclient.c, fs/afs/yfsclient.c and fs/afs/vlclient.c, but there
are some not-so-simple RPC calls to handle - FetchData and StoreData for
example).

David


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ