lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250319105554.2e2f3aab@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:55:54 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)"
 <rppt@...nel.org>, Tiwei Bie <tiwei.btw@...group.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the uml tree with the mm-stable tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the uml tree got a conflict in:

  arch/um/kernel/mem.c

between commits:

  0d98484ee333 ("arch, mm: introduce arch_mm_preinit")
  8afa901c147a ("arch, mm: make releasing of memory to page allocator more explicit")

from the mm-stable tree and commit:

  e82cf3051e61 ("um: Update min_low_pfn to match changes in uml_reserved")

from the uml tree.

I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc arch/um/kernel/mem.c
index 379f33a1babf,61b5a5ede01c..000000000000
--- a/arch/um/kernel/mem.c
+++ b/arch/um/kernel/mem.c
@@@ -66,11 -68,11 +68,12 @@@ void __init arch_mm_preinit(void
  	map_memory(brk_end, __pa(brk_end), uml_reserved - brk_end, 1, 1, 0);
  	memblock_free((void *)brk_end, uml_reserved - brk_end);
  	uml_reserved = brk_end;
+ 	min_low_pfn = PFN_UP(__pa(uml_reserved));
 -
 -	/* this will put all low memory onto the freelists */
 -	memblock_free_all();
  	max_pfn = max_low_pfn;
 +}
 +
 +void __init mem_init(void)
 +{
  	kmalloc_ok = 1;
  }
  

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ