[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7a160eed-5c27-4216-89e3-14bf61e1d2ed@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:48:00 -0500
From: "Xing, Cedric" <cedric.xing@...el.com>
To: Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, "Kirill A. Shutemov"
<kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin"
<hpa@...or.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>, "Dionna
Amalie Glaze" <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>, Dan Middleton
<dan.middleton@...ux.intel.com>, Mikko Ylinen <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] tsm: Unified Measurement Register ABI for TVMs
On 3/17/2025 6:15 PM, Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy wrote:
[...]
> Any comment on the missing event log support? Extending the measurements
> without logging the event should break the tractability feature. Can you
> add
> info about why it is ok to just add extension support for now?
>
The event log support was once proposed and discussed. Please see
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240907-tsm-rtmr-v1-0-12fc4d43d4e7@intel.com/
for details. In short, it's difficult to define a log format that fits
all applications, and luckily it doesn't have to be solved in kernel
mode, so we leave it out for now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists