lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
 <PAXPR04MB8510DE829523749E9FB5E20B88DE2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 04:47:11 +0000
From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>, Clark Wang
	<xiaoning.wang@....com>, "andrew+netdev@...n.ch" <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com"
	<edumazet@...gle.com>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "imx@...ts.linux.dev" <imx@...ts.linux.dev>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 net-next 08/14] net: enetc: add RSS support for i.MX95
 ENETC PF

> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:38:24PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > index a3ce324c716c..ecf79338cd79 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> > @@ -543,6 +543,8 @@ void enetc_set_rss_key(struct enetc_si *si, const u8
> *bytes);
> >  int enetc_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count);
> >  int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count);
> >  int enetc_send_cmd(struct enetc_si *si, struct enetc_cbd *cbd);
> > +int enetc4_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count);
> > +int enetc4_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count);
> >
> >  static inline void *enetc_cbd_alloc_data_mem(struct enetc_si *si,
> >  					     struct enetc_cbd *cbd,
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> > index f991e1aae85c..53dbd5d71859 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_pf.c
> > @@ -693,6 +693,14 @@ static void enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode(struct
> net_device *ndev)
> >  	queue_work(si->workqueue, &si->rx_mode_task);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int enetc4_pf_set_features(struct net_device *ndev,
> > +				  netdev_features_t features)
> > +{
> > +	enetc_set_features(ndev, features);
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops = {
> >  	.ndo_open		= enetc_open,
> >  	.ndo_stop		= enetc_close,
> > @@ -700,6 +708,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops enetc4_ndev_ops
> = {
> >  	.ndo_get_stats		= enetc_get_stats,
> >  	.ndo_set_mac_address	= enetc_pf_set_mac_addr,
> >  	.ndo_set_rx_mode	= enetc4_pf_set_rx_mode,
> > +	.ndo_set_features	= enetc4_pf_set_features,
> >  };
> >
> >  static struct phylink_pcs *
> > @@ -1108,6 +1117,8 @@ static void enetc4_pf_netdev_destroy(struct
> enetc_si *si)
> >  static const struct enetc_si_ops enetc4_psi_ops = {
> >  	.setup_cbdr = enetc4_setup_cbdr,
> >  	.teardown_cbdr = enetc4_teardown_cbdr,
> > +	.get_rss_table = enetc4_get_rss_table,
> > +	.set_rss_table = enetc4_set_rss_table,
> >  };
> >
> >  static int enetc4_pf_wq_task_init(struct enetc_si *si)
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > index 4e5125331d7b..1a74b93f1fd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_cbdr.c
> > @@ -299,3 +299,17 @@ int enetc_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const
> u32 *table, int count)
> >  	return enetc_cmd_rss_table(si, (u32 *)table, count, false);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc_set_rss_table);
> > +
> > +int enetc4_get_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, u32 *table, int count)
> > +{
> > +	return ntmp_rsst_query_or_update_entry(&si->ntmp.cbdrs,
> > +					       table, count, true);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc4_get_rss_table);
> > +
> > +int enetc4_set_rss_table(struct enetc_si *si, const u32 *table, int count)
> > +{
> > +	return ntmp_rsst_query_or_update_entry(&si->ntmp.cbdrs,
> > +					       (u32 *)table, count, false);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enetc4_set_rss_table);
> 
> I don't understand the logic for placing enetc4_get_rss_table() and
> enetc4_set_rss_table() in enetc_cbdr.c (built as part of fsl-enetc-core-y)?
> It's not core code, it's used only by NETC v4.

The ENETC v4 VF will reuse the driver of ENETC v1, and it also supports
RSS, so I think these functions are fine to be placed in enetc-core.

> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> > index 1a8fae3c406b..bc65135925b8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_ethtool.c
> > @@ -625,6 +625,24 @@ static int enetc_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev,
> struct ethtool_rxnfc *rxnfc,
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int enetc4_get_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_rxnfc
> *rxnfc,
> > +			    u32 *rule_locs)
> > +{
> > +	struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > +
> > +	switch (rxnfc->cmd) {
> > +	case ETHTOOL_GRXRINGS:
> > +		rxnfc->data = priv->num_rx_rings;
> > +		break;
> > +	case ETHTOOL_GRXFH:
> > +		return enetc_get_rsshash(rxnfc);
> 
> These rxnfc commands seem implemented identically to the corresponding
> subset from enetc_get_rxnfc(). Rather than duplicating those, could you
> rather return -EOPNOTSUPP for the unsupported ones on NETC v4, and reuse
> enetc_get_rxnfc()?
> 

I have explained it to Jakub in v2:
https://lore.kernel.org/imx/PAXPR04MB8510B52B7D27640C557680B4881A2@PAXPR04MB8510.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com/

So I don't want to reuse it for ENETC v4 PF.

> > +	default:
> > +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int enetc_set_rxnfc(struct net_device *ndev, struct ethtool_rxnfc
> *rxnfc)
> >  {
> >  	struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
> > @@ -685,22 +703,29 @@ static int enetc_get_rss_key_base(struct enetc_si
> *si)
> >  	return ENETC4_PRSSKR(0);
> >  }
> >
> > +static void enetc_get_rss_key(struct enetc_si *si, const u8 *key)
> > +{
> > +	int base = enetc_get_rss_key_base(si);
> > +	struct enetc_hw *hw = &si->hw;
> > +	int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < ENETC_RSSHASH_KEY_SIZE / 4; i++)
> > +		((u32 *)key)[i] = enetc_port_rd(hw, base + i * 4);
> > +}
> 
> I would have expected that this refactoring of code into
> enetc_get_rss_key() would be done as part of the previous change:
> "net: enetc: make enetc_set_rss_key() reusable".
> 

I think this goes against the theme.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ